Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade leven to version 3.1.0 #615

wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master


None yet
1 participant
Copy link

commented Apr 5, 2019

Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ leven (2.1.0 → 3.1.0) · Repo

Release Notes


  • Refactor TypeScript definition to CommonJS compatible export (#13) 1051a46






Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.


See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 6 commits:

Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Apr 5, 2019

@depfu depfu bot referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2019


Upgrade leven to version 3.0.0 #605


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Apr 7, 2019

D'oh, this trick won't work for detect-indent, because the new version uses for...of with a Map. Surprisingly IE11 does support Map, but buble's dangerousForOf transform is too naive, it basically assumes an array-like object.

@papandreou papandreou requested a review from sunesimonsen Apr 8, 2019


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Apr 8, 2019

LGTY, @sunesimonsen, or do you think we should get off Sindre's modules instead?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.