Skip to content

Conversation

@FliPPeDround
Copy link
Member

@FliPPeDround FliPPeDround commented Jul 7, 2025

Update dependencies

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated development dependencies for improved stability and compatibility, including upgrades to "@dcloudio/types", "eslint", "@types/node", and "vue-tsc".

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 7, 2025

Walkthrough

This update increases the versions of several development dependencies in various package.json files within core templates. The changes include bumping versions for @dcloudio/types, eslint, @types/node, and vue-tsc, with no other modifications to scripts or configuration.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
packages/core/template/base/package.json Updated @dcloudio/types devDependency from ^3.4.15 to ^3.4.16
packages/core/template/config/lint/package.json Updated eslint devDependency from ^9.30.0 to ^9.30.1
packages/core/template/config/typescript/package.json Updated @types/node from ^24.0.7 to ^24.0.10 and vue-tsc from ^2.2.10 to ^3.0.1

Possibly related PRs

  • chore: update deps #109: Updates development dependencies in the TypeScript template, including @types/node, similar to this PR.
  • chore: update deps #108: Bumps dependency versions in lint and typescript package.json files, focusing on devDependencies like eslint and @types/node.
  • chore: update deps #106: Updates development dependency versions in lint and typescript package.json files, related to this PR's changes.

Poem

A hop and a skip, a version ascends,
Dev dependencies polished, the update extends.
Types get sharper, lint rules refined,
In the warren of code, improvements aligned.
With each little bump, the project feels new—
🐇✨ Hooray for fresh versions, from rabbit to you!

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Check-run timed out after 90 seconds. Some checks/pipelines were still in progress when the timeout was reached. Consider increasing the reviews.tools.github-checks.timeout_ms value in your CodeRabbit configuration to allow more time for checks to complete.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e527d00 and ec6e824.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/core/template/base/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/template/config/lint/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/template/config/typescript/package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
  • GitHub Check: stable - x86_64-apple-darwin - node@20
  • GitHub Check: build (20.x, macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: lint
  • GitHub Check: stable - i686-pc-windows-msvc - node@20
  • GitHub Check: build (18.x, windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: stable - x86_64-pc-windows-msvc - node@20
  • GitHub Check: stable - aarch64-pc-windows-msvc - node@20
  • GitHub Check: stable - aarch64-apple-darwin - node@20
  • GitHub Check: build (20.x, windows-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/core/template/base/package.json (1)

64-64: ✅ Patch-level bump to @dcloudio/types appears safe
Version 3.4.15 → 3.4.16 is a patch upgrade; no breaking changes are expected.

packages/core/template/config/lint/package.json (1)

8-8: Keep an eye on ESLint 9.30.1 release notes
Although this is only a patch, ESLint occasionally introduces rule tweaks. Make sure CI lint checks still pass in all templates after the upgrade.

packages/core/template/config/typescript/package.json (2)

6-6: @types/node patch upgrade is low-risk
24.0.7 → 24.0.10 should be harmless; LGTM.


9-9: vue-tsc major bump (2.x → 3.x) may introduce breaking diagnostics
This is a major version change. Please run pnpm run type-check (or equivalent) across all templates to verify no new type errors surface.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@FliPPeDround FliPPeDround merged commit ccaa033 into main Jul 7, 2025
36 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jul 14, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Aug 11, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Aug 25, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants