New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we keep the "virtual" tec domain? #35

Closed
keilw opened this Issue Mar 4, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@keilw
Member

keilw commented Mar 4, 2018

Before the "tech" domain became available after March 2015 the RI and TCK used a "virtual" domain name units.tec I registered instead. Since then units.tech is also registered. While the "tec" domain is fairly cheap, it won't work as a URL, it is just virtual.
Should we use the 2.0 release and switch to units.tech instead?

Depending on the choice for Indriya, the new TCK would also match its package namespace.

@keilw

This comment has been minimized.

Member

keilw commented Mar 4, 2018

A) Switch to units.tech

@keilw

This comment has been minimized.

Member

keilw commented Mar 4, 2018

B) Stay with units.tec

@keilw keilw added this to the 2.0 milestone Mar 4, 2018

@keilw keilw added to do in progress and removed to do labels Mar 6, 2018

@duckAsteroid

This comment has been minimized.

Member

duckAsteroid commented Mar 7, 2018

A

@keilw

This comment has been minimized.

Member

keilw commented Mar 7, 2018

Thanks

@wick3dshadow

This comment has been minimized.

Member

wick3dshadow commented Mar 7, 2018

Option A looks great to me.

@keilw

This comment has been minimized.

Member

keilw commented Mar 14, 2018

Thanks everyone for voting. Except the TCK usage project all relevant artifacts of JSR 385 have now been migrated.

@keilw keilw closed this Mar 14, 2018

@keilw keilw removed the in progress label Mar 14, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment