Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 16, 2022. It is now read-only.


Switch branches/tags

Name already in use

A tag already exists with the provided branch name. Many Git commands accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior. Are you sure you want to create this branch?


Failed to load latest commit information.
Latest commit message
Commit time
July 8, 2022 20:31
August 12, 2016 18:00
February 16, 2016 19:09
August 30, 2018 21:26
July 8, 2022 23:39
January 29, 2015 12:00



PyPI wants me to enable 2FA just because I maintain this package, and both that and the mess resulting from a stunt of mine, I thought it'd be a good time to deprecate this package. Python 3 has os.replace and os.rename which probably do well enough of a job for most usecases. Documentation Status

Atomic file writes.

from atomicwrites import atomic_write

with atomic_write('foo.txt', overwrite=True) as f:
    f.write('Hello world.')
    # "foo.txt" doesn't exist yet.

# Now it does.

See API documentation for more low-level interfaces.

Features that distinguish it from other similar libraries (see Alternatives and Credit):

  • Race-free assertion that the target file doesn't yet exist. This can be controlled with the overwrite parameter.

  • Windows support, although not well-tested. The MSDN resources are not very explicit about which operations are atomic. I'm basing my assumptions off a comment by Doug Cook, who appears to be a Microsoft employee:

    Question: Is MoveFileEx atomic if the existing and new files are both on the same drive?

    The simple answer is "usually, but in some cases it will silently fall-back to a non-atomic method, so don't count on it".

    The implementation of MoveFileEx looks something like this: [...]

    The problem is if the rename fails, you might end up with a CopyFile, which is definitely not atomic.

    If you really need atomic-or-nothing, you can try calling NtSetInformationFile, which is unsupported but is much more likely to be atomic.

  • Simple high-level API that wraps a very flexible class-based API.

  • Consistent error handling across platforms.

How it works

It uses a temporary file in the same directory as the given path. This ensures that the temporary file resides on the same filesystem.

The temporary file will then be atomically moved to the target location: On POSIX, it will use rename if files should be overwritten, otherwise a combination of link and unlink. On Windows, it uses MoveFileEx through stdlib's ctypes with the appropriate flags.

Note that with link and unlink, there's a timewindow where the file might be available under two entries in the filesystem: The name of the temporary file, and the name of the target file.

Also note that the permissions of the target file may change this way. In some situations a chmod can be issued without any concurrency problems, but since that is not always the case, this library doesn't do it by itself.


On POSIX, fsync is invoked on the temporary file after it is written (to flush file content and metadata), and on the parent directory after the file is moved (to flush filename).

fsync does not take care of disks' internal buffers, but there don't seem to be any standard POSIX APIs for that. On OS X, fcntl is used with F_FULLFSYNC instead of fsync for that reason.

On Windows, _commit is used, but there are no guarantees about disk internal buffers.

Alternatives and Credit

Atomicwrites is directly inspired by the following libraries (and shares a minimal amount of code):

Other alternatives to atomicwrites include:

  • sashka/atomicfile. Originally I considered using that, but at the time it was lacking a lot of features I needed (Windows support, overwrite-parameter, overriding behavior through subclassing).
  • The Boltons library collection features a class for atomic file writes, which seems to have a very similar overwrite parameter. It is lacking Windows support though.


Licensed under the MIT, see LICENSE.