Skip to content

Conversation

@penguinolog
Copy link
Collaborator

Fix #146

Checklist
  • I've ensured that similar functionality has not already been implemented
  • I've ensured that similar functionality has not earlier been proposed and declined
  • I've branched off the master or python-dual-support branch
  • I've merged fresh upstream into my branch recently
  • I've ran tox successfully in local environment
  • I've included docstrings and/or documentation and/or examples for my code (if this is a new feature)

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7556787425

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 69.893%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7554908495: -0.02%
Covered Lines: 8356
Relevant Lines: 12035

💛 - Coveralls

@penguinolog penguinolog merged commit 5d4977f into urwid:master Jan 17, 2024
@penguinolog penguinolog deleted the listbox_contents branch January 17, 2024 14:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ListBox.contents returns function

2 participants