Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Integrate with AMP #283

Closed
regpaq opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Feature Request: Integrate with AMP #283

regpaq opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@m1guelpf

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@m1guelpf m1guelpf commented Aug 21, 2019

@JackEllis Any chance of considering this for v2?

@JackEllis

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

@JackEllis JackEllis commented Aug 21, 2019

@m1guelpf Potentially. We've closed up our V2 scope now so we're not bringing in anything new. We could consider for 2.1 We've already punted an exciting new feature (secret at present) to Version 2.1

@EnKrypt

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@EnKrypt EnKrypt commented Aug 31, 2019

Whether or not this project gets AMP integration support is of course up to the author and maintainers, but I think I should put forth the argument that AMP has done a lot more harm than good, and the general consensus within the developer community, especially those geared towards privacy and user control, is that we should not adopt this standard.

It's conveniently marketed as being friendly for low bandwidth users when in reality it is quite the opposite.

Kill Google AMP before it kills the web

Why AMP is bad for your site and for the Web

Google AMP is bad for E-commerce

Reddit even has an AntiGoogleAmpBot that goes over AMP links and converts them to normal ones, which a lot of people appreciate.

@JackEllis

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

@JackEllis JackEllis commented Aug 31, 2019

@EnKrypt Thanks for the input, Arvind. I've actually heard a lot of bad things about AMP in the past but I've not had a chance to dive in. I'm sure @pjrvs has his finger on the pulse with this. If it's an anti-privacy / anti-competitive behaviour then it won't be included.

@pjrvs

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

@pjrvs pjrvs commented Aug 31, 2019

AMP stores content from your site on Google's servers, so I'm not interested in integrating with AMP since Fathom has a fairly hard stance against "the goog". :)

@JackEllis

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

@JackEllis JackEllis commented Aug 31, 2019

Yikes... Closing this up.

@JackEllis JackEllis closed this Aug 31, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.