New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve repository structure in openvocab orga #23

Closed
elf-pavlik opened this Issue Aug 24, 2015 · 20 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@elf-pavlik
Member

elf-pavlik commented Aug 24, 2015

https://github.com/openvocab

  • seem not used or needed: membership, role, place, group, person, core
  • ovn - makes sense as general workspace focused on putting all other elements together
  • holodex - rename to agent? while I find it a cool name, for most people it will make no sense. also brings confusion with https://github.com/holodex
  • exchange - makes sense to me as one of ovn sub workstreams, for example IPO tables experiment might ignore this part and focus just on process
@bhaugen

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bhaugen

bhaugen Aug 24, 2015

Contributor
Contributor

bhaugen commented Aug 24, 2015

@elf-pavlik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@elf-pavlik

elf-pavlik Aug 24, 2015

Member

@Lars2i what do you think? To my understanding you don't want to get into exchanges and currencies aspect of OVN. But if we isolate process aspect nicely as well as ressources (or assets) for I/0, we would all find nice common ground to work on.

Member

elf-pavlik commented Aug 24, 2015

@Lars2i what do you think? To my understanding you don't want to get into exchanges and currencies aspect of OVN. But if we isolate process aspect nicely as well as ressources (or assets) for I/0, we would all find nice common ground to work on.

@ahdinosaur

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ahdinosaur

ahdinosaur Aug 24, 2015

Member

👍

  • remove unused (membership, role, place, group, person)
  • rename holodex to agent
  • add @elf-pavlik as org admin
  • rename core to meta
Member

ahdinosaur commented Aug 24, 2015

👍

  • remove unused (membership, role, place, group, person)
  • rename holodex to agent
  • add @elf-pavlik as org admin
  • rename core to meta
@ahdinosaur

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ahdinosaur

ahdinosaur Aug 24, 2015

Member

i also recommend we update meta, as it hasn't changed since this org began; i think it could be useful to link the repos together, provide overall context, and be a space for discussions like this.

Member

ahdinosaur commented Aug 24, 2015

i also recommend we update meta, as it hasn't changed since this org began; i think it could be useful to link the repos together, provide overall context, and be a space for discussions like this.

@bhaugen

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bhaugen

bhaugen Aug 24, 2015

Contributor

@elf-pavlik @ahdinosaur - I'm good with whatever restructuring you all want to do.

Contributor

bhaugen commented Aug 24, 2015

@elf-pavlik @ahdinosaur - I'm good with whatever restructuring you all want to do.

@elf-pavlik elf-pavlik referenced this issue Aug 24, 2015

Open

Data Model #11

@Lars2i

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Lars2i

Lars2i Aug 25, 2015

@elf-pavlik from what i understand, sounds good.

Lars2i commented Aug 25, 2015

@elf-pavlik from what i understand, sounds good.

@bhaugen

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bhaugen

bhaugen Aug 25, 2015

Contributor

Do you all want to initiate the projects repo, or should I do it?

If you do it, please make it so both we (NRP) and IPOTables can comfortably use it. For example, include something like:
Recipe, Plan, Reality
where IPOTables lives in the Recipe layer (if I understand correctly).

And if I do it, I'll include something similar that would show the IPOTables view. @Lars2i - got any suggestions? Is some of the language and the diagram from http://ipotables.net/ good for starters?

Then we can work out the details in issues.

Contributor

bhaugen commented Aug 25, 2015

Do you all want to initiate the projects repo, or should I do it?

If you do it, please make it so both we (NRP) and IPOTables can comfortably use it. For example, include something like:
Recipe, Plan, Reality
where IPOTables lives in the Recipe layer (if I understand correctly).

And if I do it, I'll include something similar that would show the IPOTables view. @Lars2i - got any suggestions? Is some of the language and the diagram from http://ipotables.net/ good for starters?

Then we can work out the details in issues.

@elf-pavlik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@elf-pavlik

elf-pavlik Aug 25, 2015

Member

@bhaugen please just go ahead and start process repository including in the README whatever you see fitting there. We can all iterate from it using issues and pull request workflow 🎯

@ahdinosaur I don't understand difference between ovn and meta repositories 😕 Can't we just move few bits of information from meta to ovn and then if really needed rename it?

Member

elf-pavlik commented Aug 25, 2015

@bhaugen please just go ahead and start process repository including in the README whatever you see fitting there. We can all iterate from it using issues and pull request workflow 🎯

@ahdinosaur I don't understand difference between ovn and meta repositories 😕 Can't we just move few bits of information from meta to ovn and then if really needed rename it?

@bhaugen

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bhaugen

bhaugen Aug 25, 2015

Contributor

First draft done: https://github.com/openvocab/process

Please improve.

Contributor

bhaugen commented Aug 25, 2015

First draft done: https://github.com/openvocab/process

Please improve.

@ahdinosaur

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ahdinosaur

ahdinosaur Aug 25, 2015

Member

@elf-pavlik my thinking is that this org is for all vocabs, not only value network vocabs although that's what i'm most interested in. but happy with whatever the group wants to do with this org, i'll follow along.

Member

ahdinosaur commented Aug 25, 2015

@elf-pavlik my thinking is that this org is for all vocabs, not only value network vocabs although that's what i'm most interested in. but happy with whatever the group wants to do with this org, i'll follow along.

@ahdinosaur

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ahdinosaur

ahdinosaur Aug 30, 2015

Member

from #17 (comment), 👍 to a separate vocab repo for resource, as it seems "assets" from "Open OS" (which i'm now using as my reference Enspiral use case for Holodex) would be resources with relationships but no exchanges or processes.

Member

ahdinosaur commented Aug 30, 2015

from #17 (comment), 👍 to a separate vocab repo for resource, as it seems "assets" from "Open OS" (which i'm now using as my reference Enspiral use case for Holodex) would be resources with relationships but no exchanges or processes.

@ahdinosaur

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ahdinosaur

ahdinosaur Sep 28, 2015

Member

i'm thinking this repo should be our "home repo" for this org.

to me, this means:

  • rename this repo to valueflows/valueflows
  • delete valueflows/meta
  • over time edit the content of the this repo's README to be an overview of the entire vocab
  • ? maybe eventually we generate the content in valueflows.github.io from the content here (with markdown -> html conversions and other magic)

thoughts?

Member

ahdinosaur commented Sep 28, 2015

i'm thinking this repo should be our "home repo" for this org.

to me, this means:

  • rename this repo to valueflows/valueflows
  • delete valueflows/meta
  • over time edit the content of the this repo's README to be an overview of the entire vocab
  • ? maybe eventually we generate the content in valueflows.github.io from the content here (with markdown -> html conversions and other magic)

thoughts?

@fosterlynn

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fosterlynn

fosterlynn Sep 29, 2015

Contributor

@ahdinosaur sounds good to me.

Except I don't get the last one.... and I noticed that you have a generated context, and then I put out my context attempt in a different place.... sorry!

Contributor

fosterlynn commented Sep 29, 2015

@ahdinosaur sounds good to me.

Except I don't get the last one.... and I noticed that you have a generated context, and then I put out my context attempt in a different place.... sorry!

@ahdinosaur

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ahdinosaur

ahdinosaur Sep 29, 2015

Member

@fosterlynn yeah, at the moment i'm thinking we follow @elf-pavlik's lead and put our per-vocab contexts within each vocabulary repo (based on the examples in that repo's markdown), then somehow we build everything all together (which may include using markdown sources in this repo) into the website. this is all open for discussion and/or an experiment to find what works best through trying things out.

Member

ahdinosaur commented Sep 29, 2015

@fosterlynn yeah, at the moment i'm thinking we follow @elf-pavlik's lead and put our per-vocab contexts within each vocabulary repo (based on the examples in that repo's markdown), then somehow we build everything all together (which may include using markdown sources in this repo) into the website. this is all open for discussion and/or an experiment to find what works best through trying things out.

@elf-pavlik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@elf-pavlik

elf-pavlik Sep 29, 2015

Member

not sure how you did renaming of orgas but now both exist

it also got gitter chat room freaked out 😉

Member

elf-pavlik commented Sep 29, 2015

not sure how you did renaming of orgas but now both exist

it also got gitter chat room freaked out 😉

@bhaugen

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bhaugen

bhaugen Sep 29, 2015

Contributor

https://gitter.im/valueflows seems to be a little confused, but also seems to work.

I take that back, it was working earlier this morning, but when I reloaded the page, it does not appear to be working...

Clicked on the name in the left panel several times, and got back in. Freaked out is an accurate description!

Contributor

bhaugen commented Sep 29, 2015

https://gitter.im/valueflows seems to be a little confused, but also seems to work.

I take that back, it was working earlier this morning, but when I reloaded the page, it does not appear to be working...

Clicked on the name in the left panel several times, and got back in. Freaked out is an accurate description!

@ahdinosaur

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ahdinosaur

ahdinosaur Sep 29, 2015

Member

not sure how you did renaming of orgas but now both exist

https://github.com/valueflows
https://github.com/openvocab

it also got gitter chat room freaked out 😉

yeah, that was me renaming and then creating openvocab again (in case i start another vocab project that doesn't fit within value flows, at least was what i was thinking). not sure i thought of all the consequences, sorry about that.

Member

ahdinosaur commented Sep 29, 2015

not sure how you did renaming of orgas but now both exist

https://github.com/valueflows
https://github.com/openvocab

it also got gitter chat room freaked out 😉

yeah, that was me renaming and then creating openvocab again (in case i start another vocab project that doesn't fit within value flows, at least was what i was thinking). not sure i thought of all the consequences, sorry about that.

@bhaugen

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bhaugen

bhaugen Sep 29, 2015

Contributor

I sorta waiting to see if @elf-pavlik and @fosterlynn can get to the valueflows chat room.

If not, https://gitter.im/gitterHQ/gitter seems to be a pretty good place to ask for help.

Contributor

bhaugen commented Sep 29, 2015

I sorta waiting to see if @elf-pavlik and @fosterlynn can get to the valueflows chat room.

If not, https://gitter.im/gitterHQ/gitter seems to be a pretty good place to ask for help.

@fosterlynn

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fosterlynn

fosterlynn Sep 29, 2015

Contributor

I can't get in, I get to a page for valueflows, but nothing is there, can provide details if it will help.

Contributor

fosterlynn commented Sep 29, 2015

I can't get in, I get to a page for valueflows, but nothing is there, can provide details if it will help.

@bhaugen

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bhaugen

bhaugen Sep 30, 2015

Contributor

https://gitter.im/valueflows seems to work again, thanks to an intervention by @mydigitalself of gitter.

Contributor

bhaugen commented Sep 30, 2015

https://gitter.im/valueflows seems to work again, thanks to an intervention by @mydigitalself of gitter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment