Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: align validator ranking metric with implementation #2002

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 19, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 0 additions & 10 deletions protocol/0056-REWA-rewards_overview.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -131,16 +131,6 @@ If a party **is not** a consensus or standby validator, their reward metric is s

$$m_v = 0$$

A specialised global rewards account type is used for these rewards.

The share of the reward attributed to the given validator gets further split between the validator itself and its delegators as outlined in [PoS rewards spec](./0061-REWP-pos_rewards.md)

#### Maximum payout per participant

For validator ranking metric based rewards the payments are subject to `reward.staking.delegation.maxPayoutPerParticipant`.
The maximum per participant is the maximum a single party (public key) on Vega can receive as a staking and delegation reward for one epoch. Each participant receives their due, capped by the max. The unpaid amount remain in the treasury.
Setting this to `0` means no cap.

### Market creation reward metrics

There will be a single market creation reward metric and reward type.
Expand Down