Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support UVM #382

Closed
veripoolbot opened this issue Aug 19, 2011 · 2 comments
Closed

Support UVM #382

veripoolbot opened this issue Aug 19, 2011 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@veripoolbot veripoolbot commented Aug 19, 2011


Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Redmine Issue: 382 from https://www.veripool.org
Original Date: 2011-08-19
Original Assignee: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)


From user:

May I make a suggestion about your emacs verilog-mode?

Could you please add UVM support to verilog-mode. Now, it has OVM
support. I just replace all ovm_ with uvm_ to support UVM highlight.

@veripoolbot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@veripoolbot veripoolbot commented Aug 19, 2011


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Date: 2011-08-19T14:21:56Z


Quite reasonable, though for the real package we're likely to duplicate the
code to support both, especially as time moves forward and ovm picks up
additional macros.

Mac, this seems to hit your area more so I'll leave it to you, but let me
know if you'd like me to knock it off instead.

BTW, it's deprecated, but I think `[uo]vm_sequencer_params_utils_begin is
missing.

@veripoolbot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@veripoolbot veripoolbot commented Sep 7, 2011


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Date: 2011-09-07T16:34:55Z


UVM 1.1 is supported as of rev717, let us know if you see any issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.