Skip to content

Add "revs" definition to allow reverse relationship mapping in STIX export config #3137

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 15, 2023

Conversation

invisig0th
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: -0.10 ⚠️

Comparison is base (aed53c0) 97.30% compared to head (59c0b32) 97.20%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3137      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.30%   97.20%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         222      222              
  Lines       44292    44302      +10     
==========================================
- Hits        43098    43064      -34     
- Misses       1194     1238      +44     
Flag Coverage Δ
linux 97.20% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
linux_replay ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
synapse/models/risk.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
synapse/lib/stormlib/stix.py 99.13% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

... and 9 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@invisig0th invisig0th merged commit 9c537e0 into master May 15, 2023
@invisig0th invisig0th deleted the visi-stix-revrefs branch May 15, 2023 20:29
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added this to the v2.13x.x milestone May 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants