Skip to content

Add SYN_LOG_DATEFMT for logging (SYN-6217) #3362

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 5, 2023
Merged

Conversation

vEpiphyte
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added enhancement reqChangelog requires changelog labels Oct 4, 2023
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added this to the v2.15x.x milestone Oct 4, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (8113e0a) 97.13% compared to head (0cb10a5) 97.20%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3362      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.13%   97.20%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         228      228              
  Lines       46731    46733       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        45393    45428      +35     
+ Misses       1338     1305      -33     
Flag Coverage Δ
linux 97.20% <100.00%> (+6.73%) ⬆️
linux_replay ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
synapse/common.py 98.50% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte merged commit ce455c7 into master Oct 5, 2023
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte deleted the feat_logging_datefmt branch October 5, 2023 22:30
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte removed the reqChangelog requires changelog label Oct 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants