Skip to content

Add $lib.iters.zip (SYN-4510) #3392

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 23, 2023
Merged

Add $lib.iters.zip (SYN-4510) #3392

merged 8 commits into from
Oct 23, 2023

Conversation

Cisphyx
Copy link
Contributor

@Cisphyx Cisphyx commented Oct 19, 2023

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (6794b31) 97.32% compared to head (518ffbc) 97.22%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3392      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.32%   97.22%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         231      231              
  Lines       46974    47027      +53     
==========================================
+ Hits        45717    45723       +6     
- Misses       1257     1304      +47     
Flag Coverage Δ
linux 97.22% <98.83%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
linux_replay ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
synapse/lib/storm.py 95.71% <100.00%> (ø)
synapse/lib/stormlib/iters.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
synapse/lib/stormtypes.py 98.80% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
synapse/tests/utils.py 94.80% <100.00%> (-1.63%) ⬇️
synapse/lib/ast.py 98.99% <94.11%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

... and 9 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


class StormLibItersTest(s_test.SynTest):

async def test_stormlib_iters_zip(self):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be good to add a test for one of the genrs raising an exception. The ExceptionGroup repr is not great, so I'm wondering if we could do something to make that a bit more clear.

@invisig0th invisig0th closed this Oct 23, 2023
@invisig0th invisig0th reopened this Oct 23, 2023
@invisig0th invisig0th merged commit f4ab53a into master Oct 23, 2023
@invisig0th invisig0th deleted the libiters-zip branch October 23, 2023 18:14
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added this to the v2.15x.x milestone Oct 26, 2023
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added reqChangelog requires changelog enhancement and removed reqChangelog requires changelog labels Oct 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants