Skip to content

SYN-6421: Synapse not modeling private inet:ipv4 with type=private #3406

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 3, 2023

Conversation

MichaelSquires
Copy link
Contributor

bugfix: Updated RFC6598 addresses to have a type of shared.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 2, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (935a40a) 97.37% compared to head (003771e) 97.27%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3406      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.37%   97.27%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         233      233              
  Lines       47895    47898       +3     
==========================================
- Hits        46636    46591      -45     
- Misses       1259     1307      +48     
Flag Coverage Δ
linux 97.27% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
linux_replay ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
synapse/models/inet.py 99.28% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@MichaelSquires MichaelSquires merged commit ed10a88 into master Nov 3, 2023
@MichaelSquires MichaelSquires deleted the blackout/SYN-6421/shared-ip-net branch November 3, 2023 13:15
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added enhancement reqChangelog requires changelog labels Nov 3, 2023
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added this to the v2.15x.x milestone Nov 3, 2023
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte removed the reqChangelog requires changelog label Nov 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants