Skip to content

Add view.fork permission (default true) #3437

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023
Merged

Add view.fork permission (default true) #3437

merged 10 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023

Conversation

invisig0th
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c9f64f2) 97.40% compared to head (3af8bf2) 97.30%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3437      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.40%   97.30%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         233      233              
  Lines       48456    48462       +6     
==========================================
- Hits        47197    47155      -42     
- Misses       1259     1307      +48     
Flag Coverage Δ
linux 97.30% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
linux_replay ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added this to the v2.15x.x milestone Nov 27, 2023
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added enhancement reqChangelog requires changelog labels Nov 27, 2023
@invisig0th invisig0th merged commit 91c3339 into master Nov 28, 2023
@invisig0th invisig0th deleted the visi-view-fork branch November 28, 2023 22:25
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte removed the reqChangelog requires changelog label Dec 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants