#Mapping news inequality
##How even legitimate news sources can paint incomplete and misleading pictures of places they cover.
The problem: Not all communities receive equal coverage, and what little coverage they do get can be skewed towards "crimes and fires".
Over time, this erodes community trust and confidence in the media’s accountability, transparency, and accuracy.
This project begins to build out ways of investigating, parsing, and visualizing newspaper coverage by geographic area, with the goal of exposing subtle bias in the areas of coverage.
View the website to see our visual analysis of 2 case studies:
- How local blogs cover Williamsburg, Brooklyn vs. Marine Park, Brooklyn
- How a Portland newspaper covers Southern Maine
- Spatial inequality in news coverage -- are communities getting covered equally? Are certain communities being overlooked?
- Transparency/accountability by news orgs -- how can news orgs audit their coverage for gaps?
Solution: A set of tools to analyze equality in coverage
Using a measure of "articles per capita" and some basic word frequency analysis, we visualized the most attention-grabbing places, and the different types of words used in headlines about each.
We'd like to develop a tool for newsrooms and civic advocates to assess local news coverage and promote more equitable distribution of journalism resources.
###What type of data you can use to visualize news coverage
- Tags with place names, scoped to the area you want to look at (neighborhoods in a city, towns in a state, etc.)
- Headlines/ledes associated with each tag, for word analysis
- This will usually be included in a tag page or search results page
###Getting the data
- Web scraper + HTML parser for scraping tag pages
- Various tools would work here: Python + Beautifulsoup, R
- Geographic tags from a WordPress site (sometimes you can export these)
There were no clear correlations The 2 places (Maine/Brooklyn) were really different cases that looked different
- Maine: pretty even per capita coverage across household income levels (so coverage was more or less proportionate with population)
- Brooklyn: extremely uneven coverage, not related to population (Marine Park has more people than Williamsburg, but only gets a fraction of the coverage)
Context is important in interpreting the data The areas in Maine that received disproportionate coverage had specific reasons why (ongoing scandal increased coverage of a small town; major state employer based in a smaller town)
- Would caution anyone doing this on a large scale to take care interpreting the results for this reason
###Hypotheses! Or what we want to explore next
who is any given media organization alienating?
it's harder to trust an organization if you don't see yourself or your community represented -- is trust lower in communities that get less coverage?
are communities that get fewer journalism resources more susceptible to disinformation?
###Types of data that could be used for comparison
- 311 calls
- Household income
- Voting data
- U.S. census rural/urban rating