patch 8.1.0034: cursor not restored with ":edit #"

Problem:    Cursor not restored with ":edit #".
Solution:   Don't assume autocommands moved the cursor when it was moved to
            the first non-blank.

Author: brammool

src/ex_cmds.c

@@ -4193,11 +4193,18 @@ do_ecmd(
 	check_arg_idx(curwin);
 
 	/* If autocommands change the cursor position or topline, we should
-	 * keep it.  Also when it moves within a line. */
+	 * keep it.  Also when it moves within a line. But not when it moves
+	 * to the first non-blank. */
 	if (!EQUAL_POS(curwin->w_cursor, orig_pos))
 	{
-	    newlnum = curwin->w_cursor.lnum;
-	    newcol = curwin->w_cursor.col;
+	    char_u *text = ml_get_curline();
+
+	    if (curwin->w_cursor.lnum != orig_pos.lnum
+		    || curwin->w_cursor.col != (int)(skipwhite(text) - text))
+	    {
+		newlnum = curwin->w_cursor.lnum;
+		newcol = curwin->w_cursor.col;
+	    }
 	}
 	if (curwin->w_topline == topline)
 	    topline = 0;

src/testdir/test_edit.vim

@@ -1387,3 +1387,17 @@ func Test_edit_quit()
   only
 endfunc
 
+func Test_edit_alt()
+  " Keeping the cursor line didn't happen when the first line has indent.
+  new
+  call setline(1, ['  one', 'two', 'three'])
+  w XAltFile
+  $
+  call assert_equal(3, line('.'))
+  e Xother
+  e #
+  call assert_equal(3, line('.'))
+
+  bwipe XAltFile
+  call delete('XAltFile')
+endfunc

src/version.c

@@ -761,6 +761,8 @@ static char *(features[]) =
 
 static int included_patches[] =
 {   /* Add new patch number below this line */
+/**/
+    34,
 /**/
     33,
 /**/