Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#8330 - take into account that static type may have been unwrapped in hasStaticInType() #8335

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 29, 2022

Conversation

someniatko
Copy link
Contributor

@someniatko someniatko commented Jul 29, 2022

fixes #8330

…pped in ExistingAtomicStaticCallAnalyzer#hasStaticInType()
@someniatko
Copy link
Contributor Author

someniatko commented Jul 29, 2022

I'm surprised this case haven't been covered by any tests :D

@AndrolGenhald AndrolGenhald added the release:fix The PR will be included in 'Fixes' section of the release notes label Jul 29, 2022
@AndrolGenhald AndrolGenhald merged commit 489706b into vimeo:4.x Jul 29, 2022
24 of 25 checks passed
@AndrolGenhald
Copy link
Collaborator

AndrolGenhald commented Jul 29, 2022

Aha, that explains it, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release:fix The PR will be included in 'Fixes' section of the release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants