Skip to content
master
Switch branches/tags
Go to file
Code

Latest commit

 

Git stats

Files

Permalink
Failed to load latest commit information.
Type
Name
Latest commit message
Commit time
 
 
src
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

README.md

Runtyper

Build Status Sauce Test Status npm license

Protect your App from type-coercion bugs

Runtyper is a Babel plugin for runtime type-checking in JavaScript. You should enable it for non-production build and check console for type-coercion warnings. As it works in runtime - no manual type-annotations needed in your codebase.

Tested in:
Sauce Test Status

Contents

Example

Imagine you have comparison x === y and in runtime values are x = 1, y = "1". When executed you will get false. In many cases this result is unexpected: you just missed type conversion. After applying Runtyper it will show warning when such situation happen:

Strict compare warning example

or you can configure to throw errors:

Strict compare error example

How it works

Runtyper wraps all type-important operations into function. When line is executed, function checks the argument types first and only then returns the result.
For example, before:

if (x === y) { ... }

After (simplified):

if (strictEqual(x, y)) { ... }

function strictEqual(a, b) {
  if (typeof a !== typeof b) {
    console.warn('Strict compare of different types: ' + typeof a + ' === ' + typeof b);
  }
  return a === b;
}

Installation

  1. Ensure you have Babel installed
  2. Install Runtyper from npm:
npm install babel-plugin-runtyper --save-dev

Usage

  1. No changes to your existing codebase needed.

  2. Add babel-plugin-runtyper to Babel config:

    • in .babelrc:

      {
        "plugins": ["babel-plugin-runtyper"]
      }

      To apply plugin only for development builds consider Babel's env option:

      {
        "env": {
          "development": {
            "plugins": ["babel-plugin-runtyper"]
          }
        }
      }
    • in webpack config:

        module: {
          rules: [
            {
              test: /\.js$/,
              exclude: /node_modules/,
              use: {
                loader: 'babel-loader',
                options: {
                  plugins: [
                    ['babel-plugin-runtyper', {enabled: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production'}]
                  ]
                }
              }
            }
          ]
        }  

      Please note to run webpack as NODE_ENV='production' webpack -p (see #2537)

    • in package.json scripts:

      "scripts": {
        "runtyper": "babel src --out-dir out --plugins=babel-plugin-runtyper --source-maps"
      }
  3. Enable source-maps to see original place of error:

  • In Chrome set Enable JavaScript source maps in devtools settings
  • In Firefox please follow this instruction
  • In Node.js use source-map-support package:
    require('source-map-support').install();

Tip: checkout examples directory to see browser and Node.js demos

Configuration

To configure plugin pass it to Babel as array:

  plugins: [
      ['babel-plugin-runtyper', options]
  ]

Options

Name Default Values Description
enabled true true, false Is plugin enabled
warnLevel "warn" "info", "warn", "error", "break" How do you want to be notified
implicitAddStringNumber "deny" "allow", "deny" Allow/deny (variable1) + (variable2) where (variable1), (variable1) are (string, number)
implicitEqualNull "deny" "allow", "deny" Allow/deny (variable1) === (variable2) where (variable1) or (variable2) is null
implicitEqualUndefined "deny" "allow", "deny" Allow/deny (variable1) === (variable2) where (variable1) or (variable2) is undefined
explicitAddEmptyString "deny" "allow", "deny" Allow/deny (variable) + "" where (variable) is not string
explicitEqualTrue "deny" "allow", "deny" Allow/deny (variable) === true where (variable) is not boolean
explicitEqualFalse "deny" "allow", "deny" Allow/deny (variable) === false where (variable) is not boolean
implicitEqualCustomTypes "deny" "allow", "deny" Allow/deny (variable1) === (variable2) where (variable1) instanceof MyClass1 and (variable2) instanceof MyClass2
excludeOperators [] ["equal", "numeric", "add", "relational"] Excludes operators checking where equal excludes ===, numeric excludes -, *, /, %, add excludes + and relational excludes >, >=, <, <=
forbiddenNodeEnvs ["production"] Array<String> Values of NODE_ENV where plugin shows warning if enabled

Warning level description

  • info - notification via console.info without stacktrace
  • warn - notification via console.warn with stacktrace
  • error - notification via console.error with stacktrace
  • break - notification via throwing error and breaking execution

The softest configuration

By default configuration is very strict. You can start with the softest one:

{
    enabled: true,
    implicitAddStringNumber: "allow",
    implicitEqualNull: "allow",
    implicitEqualUndefined: "allow",
    explicitAddEmptyString: "allow",
    explicitEqualTrue: "allow",
    explicitEqualFalse: "allow",
    implicitEqualCustomTypes: "allow"
}

The result can be something like this:

Error: Strict equal of different types: -1 (number) === "" (string)
Error: Strict equal of different types: 2 (number) === "" (string)
Error: Strict equal of different types: 56.9364 (number) === "" (string)
Error: Strict equal of different types: -0.0869 (number) === "" (string)
Error: Numeric operation with non-numeric value: null / 60 (number)
Error: Numeric operation with non-numeric value: "2017-03-29T00:00:00... (Date) / 1000 (number)
Error: Numeric operation with non-numeric value: "2017-03-29T00:00:00... (Date) / 1000 (number)
...

Supported operators

  • Strict equality (===, !==)
    Protects you from:

    1 === '1'        // false
    1 === [1]        // false
    1 === new Date() // false
    ...
  • Addition (+)
    Protects you from:

    '1' + null      // '1null'
    '1' + undefined // '1undefined'
    '1' + NaN       // '1NaN'
    1 + NaN         // NaN
    1 + {}          // '1[object Object]'
    ...
  • Arithmetic (-, *, /, %)
    Protects you from:

    1 - '1px'     // NaN
    1 - undefined // NaN
    1 * null      // 0
    1 * {}        // NaN
    ...
  • Relational (>, >=, <, <=)
    Protects you from:

    2 < '11'        // false (but '1' < '11' is true)
    1 < null        // false
    [1] < {}        // true
    2 < [11, null]  // false (but 2 < [11] is true)
    ...

Ignore line

You can exclude line from checking by special comment:

if (x === y) { // runtyper-disable-line 
    ...
}

Run on existing project

You can easily try Runtyper on existing project because no special code-annotations needed. Just build your project with Runtyper enabled and perform some actions in the app. Then inspect the console. You may see some warnings about type-mismatch operations:

Error: Strict equal of different types: -1 (number) === "" (string)
Error: Strict equal of different types: 2 (number) === "" (string)
Error: Strict equal of different types: 56.9364 (number) === "" (string)
Error: Strict equal of different types: -0.0869 (number) === "" (string)
Error: Numeric operation with non-numeric value: null / 60 (number)
Error: Numeric operation with non-numeric value: "2017-03-29T00:00:00... (Date) / 1000 (number)
Error: Numeric operation with non-numeric value: "2017-03-29T00:00:00... (Date) / 1000 (number)
...

Usage with Flow and TypeScript

Static code analysis also performs type checking. You can use Runtyper together with Flow or TypeScript to detect errors on both build and runtime stages.

Yet, static tools need extra efforts for:

  • Writing type-annotations
  • Integration with third-party libraries (as their API should be also annotated)
  • Processing external events from user / server (many different formats)
  • Training new members who is not familiar with typed JavaScript

To learn more about pros and cons of static types have a look on Eric Elliott's article You Might Not Need TypeScript (or Static Types).

Runtyper covers more cases due to it's runtime nature

Let's take an example from Flow's get started page:

// @flow
function square(n) {
  return n * n; // Error!
}

square("2");

But if square() is used to handle user's input from text field - error will not be found:

// @flow
function square(n) {
  return n * n; // no Error, until you annotate `event.target.value`
}

window.document.getElementById('username').addEventListener('change', function (event) {
  square(event.target.value);
});

Runtyper allows to catch such cases in runtime:

Textfield error

Consider both approaches to make your applications more robust and reliable.

Articles

FAQ

  1. Why I get error for template literals like ${name}${index}?
    Likely you are using babel-preset-es2015 that transforms template literals into concatenation +. And you get (string) + (number). You can fix it in several ways:

    • set plugin option implicitAddStringNumber: "allow"
    • add explicit conversion: ${name}${String(index)}
    • consider using babel-preset-env as many browsers already have native support of template literals
  2. Why explicit comparing like x === null or x === undefined are not warned?
    When you explicitly write (variable) === null you assume that variable can be null.

  3. Does it check non-strict equal == and !=?
    Nope. Non-strict comparison is a bad thing in most cases. Just quote Douglas Crockford from JavaScript, the Good Parts:

    JavaScript has two sets of equality operators: === and !==, and their evil twins == and !=. The good ones work the way you would expect. If the two operands are of the same type and have the same value, then === produces true and !== produces false. The evil twins do the right thing when the operands are of the same type, but if they are of different types, they attempt to coerce the values. The rules by which they do that are complicated and unmemorable.
    These are some of the interesting cases:

    '' == '0'           // false
    0 == ''             // true
    0 == '0'            // true
    
    false == 'false'    // false
    false == '0'        // true
    
    false == undefined  // false
    false == null       // false
    null == undefined   // true
    
    ' \t\r\n ' == 0     // true

    The lack of transitivity is alarming. My advice is to never use == and !=. Instead, always use === and !==.

    Explicit is always better when implicit, especially for readers of your code. You can set ESLint eqeqeq rule and forget about == once and for all.

If you have other questions or ideas feel free to open new issue.

Related links

Contributors

Thanks goes to these wonderful people (emoji key):


Vitaliy Potapov

💻

Revelup Zilvinas Rudzionis

💻

This project follows the all-contributors specification. Contributions of any kind welcome!

License

MIT @ Vitaliy Potapov