Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 29, 2019. It is now read-only.

[Absract] "proof purposes" is a new term but is not defined anywhere in the document #213

Closed
mwherman2000 opened this issue Jun 7, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

[Absract] "proof purposes" is a new term but is not defined anywhere in the document #213

mwherman2000 opened this issue Jun 7, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
clarify There is consensus, but the spec needs clarifying editorial Editorial changes to the specification

Comments

@mwherman2000
Copy link

Each DID Document may contain at least three things: proof purposes, verification methods, and service endpoints. Proof purposes are combined with verification methods to provide mechanisms for proving things.
@mwherman2000
Copy link
Author

Ditto for "proof purpose pattern"

@rhiaro
Copy link
Member

rhiaro commented Aug 8, 2019

I agree "proof purpose" should be defined properly somewhere.

I don't see "proof purpose pattern" anywhere in the spec though.

@rhiaro rhiaro added clarify There is consensus, but the spec needs clarifying editorial Editorial changes to the specification labels Aug 8, 2019
@brentzundel brentzundel mentioned this issue Sep 23, 2019
Closed
@jandrieu
Copy link
Contributor

Closing because we've moved it to the DID WG did-spec repo.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
clarify There is consensus, but the spec needs clarifying editorial Editorial changes to the specification
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jandrieu @rhiaro @mwherman2000