New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: SIMA application/license schema changes #670
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If these are missing example values, then the fix should be adding those values. Not removing them from the schema.
docs/openapi/components/schemas/common/SIMASteelImportLicense.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/openapi/components/schemas/common/SIMASteelImportProductSpecifier.yml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…t/SIMA-schema-refactor
@nissimsan should these then be required fields in the schema, should we also keep inspection observation in steel product too? |
@nissimsan took another pass at this, let me know if there should be some other ones I removed that should be required and added the example |
docs/openapi/components/schemas/credentials/SIMASteelImportLicenseApplicationCredential.yml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/openapi/components/schemas/credentials/SIMASteelImportLicenseApplicationCredential.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/openapi/components/schemas/credentials/SIMASteelImportLicenseApplicationCredential.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/openapi/components/schemas/credentials/SIMASteelImportLicenseApplicationCredential.yml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/openapi/components/schemas/credentials/SIMASteelImportLicenseCredential.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Solid update, @acarnagey! In summary:
|
Removing optional schema fields not in the example