Join GitHub today
Rewindable cursors #55
One possible problem I see is that this would allow infinite transactions. E.g. one can move the cursor back and forth over two or more records forever in a loop.. (I don't mean this has to happen intentionally by the programmer - could just be some edge case that wasn't handled properly)
I got impression the original design idea was that transactions would be short-lived and auto-closing?
Anyway this kind of relates to some of my comments on #72, where I questioned whether all transactions are supposed to be finite by design? To reiterate - the logic was: if all transactions were guaranteed to be finite (I'm excluding
I thought I'd mention that here as well?