From d5e84a5e6c934cd5d23dd64f975219a919d6aecd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "L. David Baron" Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 07:10:08 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [css-conditional-3] Fix comment syntax in example. Fixes #3994. --- css-conditional-3/Overview.bs | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/css-conditional-3/Overview.bs b/css-conditional-3/Overview.bs index e677c6ffda8..5e26de8d567 100644 --- a/css-conditional-3/Overview.bs +++ b/css-conditional-3/Overview.bs @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ For example, the following rule is not valid: @supports (transition-property: color) or (animation-name: foo) and (transform: rotate(10deg)) { - // ... + /* ... */ } Instead, authors must write one of the following: @@ -373,14 +373,14 @@ Instead, authors must write one of the following: @supports ((transition-property: color) or (animation-name: foo)) and (transform: rotate(10deg)) { - // ... + /* ... */ }
 @supports (transition-property: color) or
           ((animation-name: foo) and
            (transform: rotate(10deg))) {
-  // ...
+  /* ... */
 }
 
@@ -392,13 +392,13 @@ when it is the only thing in the expression. For example, the following rule is not valid:
 @supports display: flex {
-  // ...
+  /* ... */
 }
 
Instead, authors must write:
 @supports (display: flex) {
-  // ...
+  /* ... */
 }
 
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ authoring tools. For example, authors may write:
 @supports ((display: flex)) {
-  // ...
+  /* ... */
 }
 
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ though it won't change the validity of the declaration. For example, the following rule is valid:
 @supports (display: flex !important) {
-  // ...
+  /* ... */
 }