Indicate implementation Report in Core & SPARQL

[nicholascar]

In the previous version of SHACL, an Implementation Report is indicated:

This is done with the JSON config:

var respecConfig = {
    ...
    implementationReportURI: "http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-test-suite/",
    ...
}

In the new Core & SPARQL specs, we see this instead:

which uses this JSON:

var respecConfig = {
    ...
    testSuiteURI: "http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-test-suite/",
    ...
}

The report - the same in all 3 cases - is, in fact, the SHACL Test Suite and Implementation Report.

I think we need to specifically indicate the Implementation Report as this is required to be linked to for the purposes of wide review - for a move to CR.

Q: can the editors please decide on one of the following:

1. Ignore this request and stick to testSuiteURI only
2. Change to using implementationReportURI
3. Use both testSuiteURI & implementationReportURI
4. Something else

[HolgerKnublauch]

As the document covers both tests and implementation report, we could just use it for both.

We could, however, also just change the link to the test suite to become

https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/tree/gh-pages/shacl12-test-suite

which then has links back to the document for the description of the test format.

I think I prefer that latter approach.