Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Details on the use of method-specific DID parameters #36

Open
brentzundel opened this issue Sep 23, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@brentzundel
Copy link
Member

@brentzundel brentzundel commented Sep 23, 2019

@talltree

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@talltree talltree commented Oct 15, 2019

The issue relates to Section 4.3: Generic DID Parameter Names, and Section 4.4: Method-Specific DID Parameter Names. Please start by reading the issue description at w3c-ccg/did-spec#200. Also the two comments listed there.

I propose to start the discussion by focusing on these two questions:

  1. Should we assume that generic DID parameter names are distinguished by having no prefix?
  2. If so, what prefix should we use to distinguish method-specific parameter names?

The answers currently reflected in sections 4.3 and 4.4 are:

  1. Yes, generic DID parameter names have no prefix.
  2. The prefix for method-specific parameter names is the fully qualified DID method name. (This also explains why colons are the separator in method-specific parameter names.)

Are there other proposals?

@selfissued

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@selfissued selfissued commented Oct 15, 2019

Related to this is #67 (comment) - making it syntactically evident which fields in a DID are about the DID and which are application data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.