-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use case review: Content & Markup #7
Comments
In general, I think that being 'out of scope' should be a possible answer to a UC, but that does not invalidates the UC itself. Just that some other groups/organizations have to deal with it.
|
Structural semantics
4 UCs ("Index1/Behavioral UC1", "Index2/Behavioral UC2", "Index3/Behavioral UC3", "Notes1/Behavioral UC4")
Evaluation:
Another UC ("User added dictionary") about using a PWP as a dictionary.
Evaluation: probably out of scope for the first iteration of PWP?
Other
Evaluation: out of scope
Evaluation: out of scope for PWP? not sure.
Evaluation: out of scope, it's a generic web thing.
Evaluation: consolidate to describe the mecanics of browser/RS/publisher CSS?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: