Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

double check SVG 1.1 Full vs. SVG 1.2 Tiny with W3C SVG WG #63

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Fantasai suggests we explain our decision to continue to normatively reference 
SVG 1.1 Full with the SVG WG, to see what they think.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by whmc...@gmail.com on 11 Jan 2011 at 9:37

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Issue 5 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by markus.g...@gmail.com on 7 Feb 2011 at 9:16

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

The SVG WG has reviewed our use of SVG and did not object to this (see Issue 
116 and Issue 117 for other input from SVG WG).

Original comment by markus.g...@gmail.com on 16 Apr 2011 at 10:16

  • Changed state: Done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant