Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 30, 2019. It is now read-only.

add in canonical #1467

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jun 20, 2018
Merged

add in canonical #1467

merged 4 commits into from Jun 20, 2018

Conversation

scottaohara
Copy link
Member

Fixes #1392

Needs reference link to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6596

This PR does not address some of the sub-issues mentioned in 1392, but specifically:

  • adds reference to canonical in list of supported tokens
  • adds in reference to canonical in link type table, and add corresponding section of prose.

- add reference to canonical in [list of supported tokens](https://w3c.github.io/html/document-metadata.html#ref-for-supported-tokens)

- add in reference to canonical in link type table, and add corresponding section of prose.
instead of separately updating two lists (one here and one in the supported tokens table), remove the incomplete list in favor of only updating the latter.
<code>dns-prefetch</code>,
<{link/icon}>,
<{link/next}>,
<code data-x="rel-pingback">pingback</code>,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove pingback from the rel attribute value of <link> element?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

probably should do that as a different issue / PR. better to track things rather than get them all mixed together. Happy to have you open an issue about that though :)


The <{link/canonical}> keyword indicates that the URL given by the <{links/href}> attribute
is the preferred URL for the current document. Indicating the preferred URL helps search engines
reduce duplicate content, as described in more detail in The Canonical Link Relation specification. <!-- todo ref link goes here -->
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be

...specification [[!rfc6596]].

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants