Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

i18n-ISSUE-249: positioning of ruby and emphasis marks together #22

Closed
r12a opened this issue Mar 16, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

i18n-ISSUE-249: positioning of ruby and emphasis marks together #22

r12a opened this issue Mar 16, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
i:emphasis s:css-text-decor https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor/

Comments

@r12a
Copy link
Contributor

r12a commented Mar 16, 2016

https://www.w3.org/Mail/flatten/index?subject=Comments+on+CSS3+Text+Decoration&list=www-style

Raised by:Addison Phillips
Opened on:2013-02-01

3.4 (positioning)

There is text that says:

Emphasis marks are drawn exactly as if each character was assigned the mark as its ruby annotation text with the ruby position given by ‘text-emphasis-position’ and the ruby alignment as centered.

The effect of emphasis marks on the line height is the same as for ruby text.

Elsewhere there is a description of how ruby and emphasis marks interact, but this description may be considered "at odds" with that text. There should be clarity about the positioning when ruby is also present.

@r12a r12a added the s:css-text-decor https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor/ label Mar 16, 2016
@r12a
Copy link
Contributor Author

r12a commented Dec 14, 2017

This has been addressed and discussed in i18n telecon.

@r12a r12a closed this as completed Dec 14, 2017
@r12a
Copy link
Contributor Author

r12a commented Dec 15, 2017

This was closed on the CSSWG end. Fantasai can't find any reason for it to remain open on i18n end.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
i:emphasis s:css-text-decor https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor/
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant