Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Typo in reference to ECMASCRIPT equality testing #321

Closed
kasei opened this issue Jan 6, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Typo in reference to ECMASCRIPT equality testing #321

kasei opened this issue Jan 6, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
wr:commenter-agreed wr:spec-updated

Comments

@kasei
Copy link

kasei commented Jan 6, 2020

The discussion of the value space of the rdf:JSON Datatype says:

Otherwise, if A and B satisfy the Strict Equality Comparison defined in Section 7.2.15 in [ECMASCRIPT].

This seems to be a typo as both the links in this sentence point to section 7.2.16 ("Strict Equality Comparison") of the ECMASCRIPT spec.
@kasei
Copy link
Author

kasei commented Jan 6, 2020

The link to 7.2.12 also seems to be mis-numbered (it actually links to 7.2.13).

@gkellogg gkellogg added this to Editorial Work in JSON-LD Management Jan 8, 2020
gkellogg added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 8, 2020
@gkellogg
Update section references into ECMASCRIPT for JSON comparison.
ae0f718 
For #321.
@gkellogg gkellogg mentioned this issue Jan 8, 2020
Merged
@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

gkellogg commented Jan 8, 2020

Updated in #322. @kasei please acknowledge.

@gkellogg gkellogg moved this from Editorial Work to Editorial work complete in JSON-LD Management Jan 8, 2020
@kasei
Copy link
Author

kasei commented Jan 10, 2020

@gkellogg looks good. Thanks.

gkellogg added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2020
@gkellogg
Update section references into ECMASCRIPT for JSON comparison.
597a8c4 
For #321.
@gkellogg gkellogg removed this from Editorial work complete in JSON-LD Management Jan 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
wr:commenter-agreed wr:spec-updated
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@kasei @gkellogg