Big Picture Revision #159

Closed
aboba opened this Issue Oct 29, 2014 · 3 comments

Projects

None yet

4 participants

@aboba
Contributor
aboba commented Oct 29, 2014

The current "Big Picture" has candidates originating from RTCIceTransport. Since the onlocalcandidate method has been moved to the RTCIceGatherer, this is not correct. Proposal is to replace the current big picture with the enclosed one.
image

@aboba aboba added the 1.1 label Nov 21, 2014
@juberti
juberti commented Dec 12, 2014

@pthatcherg to add the arrow for candidates from JS to IceTransport

@aboba
Contributor
aboba commented Jan 5, 2015

Here is a revision that adds the arrows.
ortc-bigy-picture

@pthatcherg

Thanks Bernard.

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:30 PM, aboba notifications@github.com wrote:

Here is a revision that adds the arrows.
[image: ortc-bigy-picture]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/808811/5620244/ee192362-94de-11e4-9e89-c4caa418132c.png


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#159 (comment).

@robin-raymond robin-raymond pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2015
Robin Raymond Updated Section 8.3 to reflect proposed matching rules, reflecting:
#48

Update to the Statistics API, reflecting:
#85

Update on 'automatic' use of scalable video coding, as noted in:
#156

Update to the H.264 parameters, as noted in:
#158

Update to the 'Big Picture', as noted in:
#159

Added support for maxptime, as noted in:
#160

Changed 'RTCIceTransportEvent' to 'RTCIceGathererEvent' as noted in:
#161

Update to RTCRtpUnhandledEvent as noted in:
#163

Added support for RTCIceGatherer.state as noted in:
#164

Revised the text relating to RTCIceTransport.start() as noted in:
#166

Added text relating to DTLS interoperability with WebRTC 1.0, as noted in:
#167

Revised the text relating to RTCDtlsTransport.start() as noted in:
#168

Clarified handling of incoming connectivity checks by the RTCIceGatherer as noted in:
#170

Added a reference to the ICE consent specification, as noted in:
#171
a927ecf
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment