Skip to content

Simplify text regarding event handlers #309

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
ibc opened this issue Dec 25, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Simplify text regarding event handlers #309

ibc opened this issue Dec 25, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@ibc
Copy link
Contributor

ibc commented Dec 25, 2015

This event handler, of event handler type xxxxxx, uses the RTCXxxXxxxXxxxxEvent interface. It must be supported by all objects implementing the RTCXxxXxxxx interface.

Do we really need such an exact text in the definition of all the event handlers within the spec? Yes, WebRTC 1.0 does it, but it becomes really annoying/boring for the reader (IMHO).

@aboba
Copy link
Contributor

aboba commented Jan 12, 2016

WebRTC 1.0 has changed much of the text relating to event handlers, so that a lot of the above text is now gone. The ORTC specification should do the same.

@aboba
Copy link
Contributor

aboba commented Jul 7, 2016

Went through all the event handler text. With the adoption of the WebRTC 1.0 "statechange" event, quite a bit of the event handler text could be deleted. Also, I do not think it makes sense for an EventHandler to be nullable. The event table also needed to be updated to reflect the "statechange" event.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants