New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark Identity as a feature at risk? #668

Closed
aboba opened this Issue Mar 14, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@aboba
Contributor

aboba commented Mar 14, 2017

As far as I can tell, there are no implementations of the identity mechanism in ORTC and only one in WebRTC. Should we mark it as "at risk"?

Related WebRTC 1.0 issue: w3c/webrtc-pc#1074

aboba added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2017

@robin-raymond

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

robin-raymond commented Mar 14, 2017

Yes, I agree subject to the outcome of WebRTC's API. I think this is an area that can remain in the area of experimentation. ORTC Lib stubbed this API because it was not friendly to applications that are full apps and not browser based and they did not make sense for applications with the assumptions that were originally designed. Perhaps that has or will change though.

@aboba aboba added the PR exists label Mar 14, 2017

@aboba aboba closed this Mar 15, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment