"nohost" gathering policy #742
Closed
Labels
Comments
There are use-cases where I am not interested in the local candidates such as when talking to an SFU. In that case, the SFU will discover the candidates as peer-reflexive. So the nohost option would only be useful if the user agent would place more privacy restrictions on gathering candidates such as a prompt asking for permission. I haven't seen that yet and the "only default route" gathering policy (mode 3 from https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling-03) seems to work well enough. Away with it ;-) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ORTC has an
RTCIceGatherPolicy
of "nohost" while WebRTC 1.0 does not define anRTCIceTransportPolicy
of "nohost":https://rawgit.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/master/webrtc.html#rtcicetransportpolicy-enum
Related WebRTC 1.0 PR: w3c/webrtc-pc#1176 (RTCIceTransportPolicy enum descriptions)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: