-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Chore: export definitions #54
Conversation
@marcoscaceres What signal will tell us this is ready to merge? |
I'll ping back here - high priority for me to fix after TPAC. |
Relevant WIP on the ReSpec side: https://github.com/w3c/respec/pull/2508 |
@marcoscaceres is this good to review / merge? |
It's ok to review, but not to merge yet ... still working on the ReSpec side... but promise this will make a huge difference to specs relying on this spec - so I kindly ask for your patience! |
any update on this, we need it for screen fold angle api as well |
Oh, we are super close! @sidvishnoi, all ready? |
Yep. It's ready just today! |
Co-Authored-By: Sid Vishnoi <sidvishnoi8@gmail.com>
Rebased ... @siusin, this should be ready to go. Only ReSpec usage changes. |
Ok, thanks @marcoscaceres and @sidvishnoi ! |
I guess as a WD or a CR. @yoavweiss , the spec has been a Proposed Recommendation forever. I don't think we can hope to push it to REC anytime soon. ok to go back to CR? |
I don't think there's a lot of work left, but at the same time, going back to CR is not awful, so WFM. |
Don't merge yet! Working on ReSpec support for this.
This will allow other ReSpec/BikeShed specifications reference the "visible", "hidden", and "visibility states" concepts, by doing:
[=Document/visibility state=]
[=Document/hidden=]
[=Document/visible=]
This is important for other specs, like Screen Orientation, that depend heavily on being able to check visibility state of a Document.
Preview | Diff