Service Workers 2021 Working Group Charter 2021

[plehegar]

New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.

Charter Review

Charter:

What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.

• Existing

• Existing WG recharter
• If this is a charter extension or revision, link a diff from previous charter, and any issue discussion:

Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, and security. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.

Communities suggested for outreach: none

Known or potential areas of concern: none

Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)
https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts

Anything else we should think about as we review?
Nope

[plehegar]

cc @jakearchibald @jungkees

[michael-n-cooper]

No comments from APA, we had reviewed with no comments the Service Workers spec. In a future charter with new deliverables, APA may have more interest. Over to @brewerj to complete accessibility horizontal review.

[samuelweiler]

Security and privacy reviews completed. No security nor privacy issues on the charter. Editorial issues on the charter filed in
w3c/charter-drafts#307
w3c/charter-drafts#308
w3c/charter-drafts#309
w3c/charter-drafts#310
w3c/charter-drafts#313
and
w3c/charter-drafts#314.

Also filed two issues on the Service Workers spec.

I prefer to see more than one chair for most WGs, and I'm disappointed to see only one here.

[himorin]

No comment/request from i18n.

[michael-n-cooper]

APA has no comments. Over to @brewerj to complete accessibility horizontal review.

[plehegar]

@samuelweiler , regarding the Chairs, this is still under discussion. @ylafon has an action item from W3M.

[dontcallmedom]

rechartered