Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linked Building Data #94

Open
tidoust opened this issue Jul 4, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

4 participants
@tidoust
Copy link

commented Jul 4, 2017

The Linked Building Data CG studies building information modelling (BIM) and Web of Data technologies.

They are considering transitioning to a Working Group and prepared an initial draft WG charter.

See other documents on the LBD CG group's main page.

@tidoust tidoust created this issue from a note in Strategy Funnel (Incubation) Jul 4, 2017

@tidoust tidoust added the Data label Jul 4, 2017

@tidoust tidoust added the Geospatial label Mar 14, 2018

@tidoust

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

commented Jun 5, 2018

Presentation slides from Pieter during the Spatial Data on the Web IG F2F

@pipauwel

This comment has been minimized.

@6a6d74

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Jul 9, 2018

During the Spatial Data on the Web Interest Group F2F we discussed a number of points. I've added these here so that by the time we get to TPAC 2018 and our next opportunity to talk, we have some record to refer to.

  1. We agreed to meet at TPAC 2018
  2. LBD CG wanted to offload the geometry serialisation task to another standards group; @lieberjosh noted the work originating from Cesium that aims to create an OGC community standard for geometry serialisation (3D tiles); he agreed to send links to that work and to do the necessary introductions
  3. SDW IG will keep LBD CG informed of OGC work in the Integrated Digital Building Environment (IDBE) Group to harmonise with CityGML, PipelineML, Muddy and other standardised representations of the built environment; noting that they are really intended for different purposes, so there's not much [semantic?] overlap.
@tidoust

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

commented Feb 4, 2019

Statement of interest to transition to a Working Group in #170.

@tidoust tidoust assigned draggett and tidoust and unassigned tidoust Feb 19, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.