Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

definition of region in example 42 is probably not correct #24

pthopesch opened this issue May 3, 2016 · 1 comment


None yet
2 participants
Copy link

commented May 3, 2016

In example 42 the region is defined as follows:
Region: id=regionExample1 width=50% lines=3 regionanchor=0%,0% viewportanchor=0%,0% scroll=up

The correct definition sould be:
id:regionExample1 width.50% lines:3 regionanchor:0%,0% viewportanchor:0%,0% scroll:up



This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented May 9, 2016

Yes, the mapping does not match the latest draft of the WebVTT spec. The explanation is that the mapping document was based on a previous version of WebVTT where the notation with "=" was correct.

As it is not clear if the new substantial edit is already implemented somewhere and also if it will make in the final spec version I propose to leave it that way for now but come back to it once the WebVTT spec is stable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.