Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update to SoTD section for PR.
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
msporny committed Jul 14, 2019
1 parent b085945 commit d92ceaf
Showing 1 changed file with 12 additions and 53 deletions.
65 changes: 12 additions & 53 deletions index.html
Expand Up @@ -168,76 +168,35 @@
</p>

<p>
The Working Group seeks implementation feedback, having set the requirement of
at least two implementations of each feature as the exit criteria for the
Candidate Recommendation phase. The group aims to obtain reports from two
producers and two consumers for each feature if possible. For details, see the
<a href="https://github.com/w3c/vc-test-suite/">test suite</a> and sample
The Working Group has received implementation feedback such that there are

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@TallTed

TallTed Jul 15, 2019

Member

feedback such that
-> feedback showing that

at least two implementations for each normative feature in the specification.
The group has obtained reports from nine (9) implementations. For details, see
the <a href="https://github.com/w3c/vc-test-suite/">test suite</a> and
<a href="https://w3c.github.io/vc-test-suite/implementations/">implementation report</a>.
</p>

<p>
The following features are considered at risk of removal due to potentially
insufficient implementation experience (reports): <code>credentialSchema</code>
property, <code>refreshService</code> property, <code>evidence</code> property,
zero-knowledge proof support, <code>disputedClaim</code> property, JWT support,
and <code>nonTransferable</code> property.
</p>

<p>
Changes since the last publication of this document include:
</p>

<ul>
<li>
Editorial modifications to group similar information together and make the
document flow easier to navigate.
</li>
<li>
Added a Concrete Lifecycle Example section.
</li>
<li>
Modified conformance statements to ensure that all conformance statements are
testable.
</li>
<li>
Renamed the <code>subject</code> property to <code>credentialSubject</code>.
</li>
<li>
Clarified that <a>verifiable credentials</a> and <a>verifiable presentations</a>
MUST include the <code>@context</code> <a>property</a> and that for a
<a>verifiable credential</a> or <a>verifiable presentation</a> to be
<a>verifiable</a> at least one proof mechanism MUST be expressed: external or
embedded.
</li>
<li>
Clarified that a <a>verifiable credential</a> MUST contain the
<code>issuer</code> and <code>issuanceDate</code> properties.
</li>
<li>
Added significant clarifying text for Zero-Knowledge Proof and JSON Web Token
use.
</li>
<li>
Added a Proof Formats section.
</li>
<li>
Clarified JSON-LD Context URLs and their ability to be cached.
Editorial clarifications related to the support of various proof mechanisms
by this specification.
</li>
<li>
Refactored the Verification section to a be a non-normative Validation section.
Editorial clarifications related to JSON-LD processing not being necessary for
conforming implementations.
</li>
<li>
Marked a number of features as features at risk and documenting implementation
details that might change based on feedback from implementers.
Editorial clarifications related to JWT processing.
</li>
<li>
Promoted the Privacy Considerations, Security Considerations,
Accessibility Considerations, and Internationalization Considerations (new)
sections to the top level.
Editorial clarifications related to the level of interoperability (data model
and syntax) that this specification is designed to achieve.
</li>
<li>
Moved some content out to an Implementation Guidance document.
Editorial updates throughout the specification to ease readability.
</li>
</ul>

Expand Down

0 comments on commit d92ceaf

Please sign in to comment.