Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verifier Role Confusion #984

Closed
mwherman2000 opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Verifier Role Confusion #984

mwherman2000 opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
pending close Close if no objection within 7 days question terminology

Comments

@mwherman2000
Copy link

I have a clarifying question about the VC 3-role model ...a perhaps naïve question about the Verifier role...

Is the Verifier role
(a) a "service" that can be asked to verify the authenticity of a VC for someone? ...or...
(b) is the Verifier the someone who is seeking to have the authenticity of a VC verified?
...they're quite different.

...do you have link that explains your choice (e.g. into the VC spec)?

A Bank is used in many Verifier examples (not sure if its used in the VC spec itself) ...this choice doesn't provide any clarity because a Bank can be both an (a) and a (b).

This definition from the VC spec isn't adequate...

A role an entity performs by receiving one or more verifiable credentials, optionally inside a verifiable presentation for processing.

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Apr 4, 2023

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2023-04-04

  • no resolutions were taken
View the transcript

1.2. Verifier Role Confusion (issue vc-data-model#984)

See github issue vc-data-model#984.

Kristina Yasuda: By Michael Herman. No comments on this issue. Anyone willing to sign up for it?.

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Apr 13, 2023

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2023-04-12

  • no resolutions were taken
View the transcript

4.9. Verifier Role Confusion (issue vc-data-model#984)

See github issue vc-data-model#984.

Brent Zundel: issue #984 no one has commented on it. No one has asked to be assigned to it.

Charles Lehner: i think the (b) there may have been what was called "the relying party".

Brent Zundel: what should we do?
… not for the day - looking like no action will be taken for #984.

Oliver Terbu: wishes to be assigned to #984.

Brent Zundel: will be bothering for those not marked close. We're done. IIW next week!


@awoie
Copy link
Contributor

awoie commented Apr 25, 2023

I have a clarifying question about the VC 3-role model ...a perhaps naïve question about the Verifier role...

Is the Verifier role (a) a "service" that can be asked to verify the authenticity of a VC for someone? ...or... (b) is the Verifier the someone who is seeking to have the authenticity of a VC verified? ...they're quite different.

...do you have link that explains your choice (e.g. into the VC spec)?

A Bank is used in many Verifier examples (not sure if its used in the VC spec itself) ...this choice doesn't provide any clarity because a Bank can be both an (a) and a (b).

This definition from the VC spec isn't adequate...

A role an entity performs by receiving one or more verifiable credentials, optionally inside a verifiable presentation for processing.

I'd say that both models a) and b) can apply. At least I observed both cases in the field.

Do you think that any of the sections in the VCDM that involves the verifier role would be affected by this ambiguity? Do you have a list of paragraphs that would be specifically affected by this? If we cannot point to specific paragraphs that would need to change, I'd suggest closing this issue.

@Sakurann Sakurann added the pending close Close if no objection within 7 days label Jun 21, 2023
@Sakurann
Copy link
Contributor

question has been answered. no actions right away

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Jun 22, 2023

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2023-06-21

  • no resolutions were taken
View the transcript

2.3. Verifier Role Confusion (issue vc-data-model#984)

See github issue vc-data-model#984.

Kristina Yasuda: Ok I think this is pending close.
… Any objections?

Manu Sporny: +1 to pending close.

@brentzundel
Copy link
Member

No objections raised to closing since marked pending close, closing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pending close Close if no objection within 7 days question terminology
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants