You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The understanding document goes into detail on how to approach gradational focus indicators, but no examples have been given describing how to handle gradational backgrounds. Pages that have a non-solid background image covering the whole page or make use of parallax scrolling effects will result in a near-infinite number of color combinations if a page is scrolled and/or changes are made to the viewport size.
How can this be addressed pragmatically to benefit users without causing undue burden on testers at the same time?
This issue has been raised on behalf of TPGi, based on an internal consultation process. An article containing all of our comments can be found on our blog, along with an introduction and acknowledgments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My personal opinion is that if the contrast of background colors that change are close enough to need to be tested for each combination then they would likely not meet the user need of people with low vision in certain scroll combinations and would likely fail in certain combinations as well. I agree that the text would have the same issue today under SC 1.4.3. In these cases it would be an easy solution to use a double ring focus indicator or some other mechanism to indicate focus such as a solid box with a border to guarantee there is sufficient contrast across variations of background images or background gradients.
Agree with @mraccess77 that this is the same issue as 1.4.3 currently.
I suggest adding the following to the Understanding:
Some designs have pages with a non-solid background image covering the whole (or part) of the page or make use of parallax scrolling effects which result in a near-infinite number of color combinations if a page is scrolled and/or changes are made to the viewport size. If the contrast of background colors that change are close enough to need to be tested for each combination then they would likely not meet the user need of people with low vision in certain scroll combinations and would likely fail in certain combinations as well. In these cases it would be an easy solution to use a double ring focus indicator or some other mechanism to indicate focus such as a solid box with a border to guarantee there is sufficient contrast across variations of background images or background gradients.
The understanding document goes into detail on how to approach gradational focus indicators, but no examples have been given describing how to handle gradational backgrounds. Pages that have a non-solid background image covering the whole page or make use of parallax scrolling effects will result in a near-infinite number of color combinations if a page is scrolled and/or changes are made to the viewport size.
How can this be addressed pragmatically to benefit users without causing undue burden on testers at the same time?
This issue has been raised on behalf of TPGi, based on an internal consultation process. An article containing all of our comments can be found on our blog, along with an introduction and acknowledgments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: