Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3.3.9 Redundant Entry out of order #2764

Closed
awkawk opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 5 comments · Fixed by #2819
Closed

3.3.9 Redundant Entry out of order #2764

awkawk opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 5 comments · Fixed by #2819

Comments

@awkawk
Copy link
Member

awkawk commented Nov 3, 2022

3.3.7 is Level AA, 3.3.8 is Level AAA, and 3.3.9 (redundant entry) is Level A. We have been ordering new SC so that Level A are first, then AA, then AAA. This seems to be the only instance where this isn't followed.

The fix would be to make 3.3.9 Redundant Entry into 3.3.7 Redundant Entry and adjust the other two SC.

@bruce-usab
Copy link
Contributor

Nice catch! Which is the file to edit to make this correction?

@awkawk
Copy link
Member Author

awkawk commented Nov 4, 2022

guidelines/index.html

Not sure if the Understanding/toc.html also needs to be updated.

@yatil
Copy link
Contributor

yatil commented Nov 5, 2022

Changes here would impact the following PR and the other supporting documents, like understanding.

Considering that users are now used to SCs being out of order, I wonder how important this change is.

@awkawk
Copy link
Member Author

awkawk commented Nov 10, 2022

@yatil it does help a bit in quickly determining whether an individual SC is from 2.0/2.1/2.2

@yatil
Copy link
Contributor

yatil commented Nov 10, 2022

OK. (FWIW: I have stopped contributing to WCAG 2 due to exhaustion and mental health concern and had unsubscribed from all issues. I would prefer to be not tagged in the future.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants