Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 30, 2018. It is now read-only.

For purpose of controls, more terms are needed #586

Closed
User1stAmihai opened this issue Nov 20, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

For purpose of controls, more terms are needed #586

User1stAmihai opened this issue Nov 20, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@User1stAmihai
Copy link

Hello,
Based on our research, we learned that some users are interested in the ability to control the screen. We collected this information from 3 of our customers. Having to participate in the COGA group, I believe that there is a clear need for more terms to be added. For those 3 customers, we are looking into the means to implement it over their websites.
We believe the following terms should be in used for
A> links list (https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-conventional-links): Top, Bottom, Start, End, Related (gallery of products, one of the products - may have a related products), Page map, New, down (scroll down), up (scroll up)
B> Buttons and controls list (https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-conventional-buttons-or-controls) : Call (for any voice communication needs), Connect (for any voice communication needs), Release (similar to Esc), Mute (for any voice communication needs), Settings (general), Comment (general), Collapse (verse expand), Open popup, Open window, Download, Upload, Share, drag (in case the button needs to be dragged right or left top or bottom), next step (1/4).

Thank you

@joshueoconnor
Copy link
Contributor

Looping in @lseeman so she is aware of this, thanks.

@joshueoconnor
Copy link
Contributor

@johnfoliot With your input into the personalisation/metadata work - Would you have anything to add?

@awkawk awkawk added the Defer label Jan 21, 2018
@awkawk
Copy link
Member

awkawk commented Jan 21, 2018

(Official WG response)
Unfortunately, due to issues around the implementation and feasibility the purposes related to links and buttons have been removed, but the purposes related to form inputs were retained and expanded. We do intend to expand on this work in future, and would like to defer this comment for future work.

@awkawk awkawk closed this as completed Jan 21, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants