Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

create separate security and privacy considerations sections #187

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 19, 2022

Conversation

equalsJeffH
Copy link
Collaborator

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH commented Jan 19, 2022

This is a very quickly done separation of section 6. Security and Privacy Considerations into two separate "security cons" and "privacy cons" sections in order to get our editors' draft to be published.

upon a quick scan it seemed the last two subsections were the only privacy-oriented ones, so I carved them into the new "privacy cons" section.

This will need review and polishing no doubt, but hopefully will re-instate editors' draft auto-updating.

fixes #186


Preview | Diff

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH self-assigned this Jan 19, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jyasskin jyasskin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think Timing Attacks is also a privacy consideration. Otherwise, LGTM. It seems fine to split these sections even if w3c/specberus#1346 concludes that it's not actually required.

Copy link
Member

@nsatragno nsatragno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm % Jeffrey's comment.

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think Timing Attacks is also a privacy consideration.

LOL indeed it is, I guess I didn't actually read it in my rush the first time around 🤪

fixed in c04caaf

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH merged commit 466e853 into main Jan 19, 2022
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2022
SHA: 466e853
Reason: push, by @equalsJeffH

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This PR indeed fixed the editors' draft spec publishing problem that instigated issue #186.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

W3C policy requires Privacy Considerations and Security Considerations to be separate sections
3 participants