New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spec draft points to wrong GitHub issues page #183
Comments
good catch, thanks. |
the "Status of this Document" section is generated by bikeshed AFAIK. @jcjones -- is the href attribute, of the link Brad is pointing to, configurable within our bikeshed instance (i.e., the one that generates the gh-pages branch's content, i.e., the editors' draft)? |
hm, I tried adding the "issue tracking" metadata param within index.bs like so.. |
Note that this exposes another problem: we had locked our Bikeshed version some time ago to a "known good" version to avoid other issues. So even though Tab has fixed this issue in the upstream sources we do not benefit from it. A long time ago I'd suggested that we keep our Bikeshed config in our own repo and copy it over the Bikeshed version (i.e. keep our own version of bikeshed/include/webauthn just like we do for bikeshed/spec-data right now). I just never got around to it. This seems like another reason to do that. |
The "please use GitHub issues" language in the "Status of this Document" section points to the GitHub issues page for the reporting spec, not this one.
https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-webauthn-20160531/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: