Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spec draft points to wrong GitHub issues page #183

Closed
hillbrad opened this issue Aug 24, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Spec draft points to wrong GitHub issues page #183

hillbrad opened this issue Aug 24, 2016 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@hillbrad
Copy link

The "please use GitHub issues" language in the "Status of this Document" section points to the GitHub issues page for the reporting spec, not this one.

https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-webauthn-20160531/

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

good catch, thanks.

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

the "Status of this Document" section is generated by bikeshed AFAIK. @jcjones -- is the href attribute, of the link Brad is pointing to, configurable within our bikeshed instance (i.e., the one that generates the gh-pages branch's content, i.e., the editors' draft)?

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

hm, I tried adding the "issue tracking" metadata param within index.bs like so..
Issue Tracking: Github https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues, but the resultant bikeshed output still has the problem as-described by Brad. However, this did add an "issue tracking" item to the spec's front matter under the spec title, which is something we oughta retain in any case.

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

see speced/bikeshed#799

@vijaybh
Copy link
Contributor

vijaybh commented Sep 1, 2016

Note that this exposes another problem: we had locked our Bikeshed version some time ago to a "known good" version to avoid other issues. So even though Tab has fixed this issue in the upstream sources we do not benefit from it.

A long time ago I'd suggested that we keep our Bikeshed config in our own repo and copy it over the Bikeshed version (i.e. keep our own version of bikeshed/include/webauthn just like we do for bikeshed/spec-data right now). I just never got around to it. This seems like another reason to do that.

vijaybh added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 1, 2016
jcjones pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2016
* Use a local copy of the bikeshed config

Fixes #183

* Add issue tracking link to metadata per earlier comment from @jcjones

* Change links to https

* Fixed broken markup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants