From 0011da48ad2c51ae01424e595379c8a34cbb2f1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Jacobs Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 15:40:55 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] If you reference an issue mulitple times in the spec, for example:

respec generates duplicate ids. So this edit removes that construct in favor of some explicit links. --- index.html | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index ca4361f..70ce8ca 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -976,7 +976,7 @@

  • Return p
  • -

    +

    See issue 129.

    @@ -1204,8 +1204,8 @@

    cards the origin knows about. -

    - There has been push-back to always requiring display of instruments +

    + In issue 98 there has been push-back to always requiring display of instruments (e.g., on a mobile devices). User agents can incrementally show instruments. Or user agents can return an empty instrumentKey and it becomes the payment app's responsibility to display instruments to @@ -1254,8 +1254,8 @@

    eliminating an extra click (first open the payment app then select the Instrument).

    -

    - Should we require that, if displayed, individual instruments must be +

    + Again related to issue 98: Should we require that, if displayed, individual instruments must be selectable? Or should we allow flexibility that instruments may be displayed, but selecting any one invokes all registered payment handlers? One idea that has been suggested: the user agent (e.g., on