From 34b40d98f25d6a40701dd104f544e21a9b9e2a57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francois Daoust <fd@tidoust.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 07:49:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Adjust patch for saa-non-cookie-storage

Spec now defines the `requestStorageAccess` parameter as optional, and notes
in an inline issue that this won't work unless Web IDL adopts a mechanism to
specify that a dictionary cannot be empty. In the meantime, the problem is the
same as before from a curation perspective.
---
 ed/idlpatches/saa-non-cookie-storage.idl.patch | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ed/idlpatches/saa-non-cookie-storage.idl.patch b/ed/idlpatches/saa-non-cookie-storage.idl.patch
index f271ca03a9ea..48235e1827a7 100644
--- a/ed/idlpatches/saa-non-cookie-storage.idl.patch
+++ b/ed/idlpatches/saa-non-cookie-storage.idl.patch
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ index 45330025c..6cc0a7887 100644
  
  partial interface Document {
    Promise<boolean> hasUnpartitionedCookieAccess();
--  Promise<StorageAccessHandle> requestStorageAccess(StorageAccessTypes types);
+-  Promise<StorageAccessHandle> requestStorageAccess(optional StorageAccessTypes types = {});
  };
  
  enum SameSiteCookiesType { "all", "none" };