New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[question] Is the servient a hypervisor or single application vm? #417
Comments
IMHO (and according to the WoT security doc) a script should be run isolated. Script management is not yet standardized in WoT, unless someone defines a WoT TD + service for that. |
The terminology section of WoT Architecture defines a servient: |
Thank you @mlagally and @zolkis for your answers. However, I have further considerations on this topic. First, I'll do my best to specify a little bit better the two scenarios described above: single application vs hypervisor. Single applicationIn case of a single application if I want to run multiple applications on my host I should have the following situation: HypervisorOtherwise, in the hypervisor scenario the same situation looks like the following: QuestionsIs there any consensus about this issue in the community? if not, will it be addressed in the next phase? or is it considered an implementation detail? |
Arch call on Oct 20th: |
Hello, I have some doubts about the application scripts described in section 8.1 of the latest draft. In particular, is not clear to me if the servient is meant to run one application at a time or if it more like a hypervisor where multiple applications can be run and stopped at will.
I'm not sure if this is more an implementation detail but I'd like to have a more deep understanding of this topic because we are working on this is issue and knowing this detail will make a difference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: