W3C specs and API reviews
Clone or download
Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.
2013 Update Web Animations.md Jan 7, 2015
2014 Move EME opinion here Oct 7, 2014
2015 Update presentation-api.md Oct 28, 2015
2016/11 Update webvr.md Nov 30, 2016
ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md Update greeting for next TAG meeting, in 東京. Oct 30, 2018
README.md README: fix links with spaces to use encoded spaces May 3, 2017


W3C TAG Specification Reviews

This repository is for specification reviews by the W3C Technical Architecture Group; usually (but not always) from W3C Working Groups.

How reviews are performed/prioritized

We use the issues list to track our reviews; you can request a review for your spec by adding a new issue. Please include a link to the relevant specification(s). As well, please include info on timeliness of the required review, whether a security review / privacy been done and the expectation of what happens next after the review. We have included a useful template for new issues that should lead you through the process. In most cases the review will be completed and documented in the comments field of the issue itself.

Generally speaking, we will discuss and review in our own issue list and cross-link to relevant issues in the specs we are reviewing. See https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/112

More detailed reviews

In some cases we have prepared more detailed review documents in response to request for review. The ones we have prepared thus far are: