New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

figure out some better way to provide the cached functions #4

Closed

ammen99 opened this issue Oct 20, 2018 · 1 comment

Member

ammen99 commented Oct 20, 2018

Perhaps with the decorator pattern? We need to make sure that the user of the library can't mix the types.

Member Author

ammen99 commented Jan 3, 2020

Fixed in #16

ammen99 closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment