chore: use zx to replace xtask

[hyf0]

Related issue (if exists)

Summary

🤖 Generated by Copilot at 5abf645

This pull request removes the xtask crate and replaces its functionality with node scripts for benchmarking the rspack crate with different versions of the three.js library. It also updates the code owners file, the TypeScript config file, and the cargo config file to reflect the changes. Additionally, it adds a utility script to check the workspace root and a typecheck script to verify the scripts folder.

Walkthrough

🤖 Generated by Copilot at 5abf645

• Remove xtask crate and replace its commands with node scripts for benchmarking (link, link, link, link, link, link, link, link, link)
• Refactor code owners specification to use cargo config feature (link, link)
• Add utility and type checking scripts for node scripts (link, link, link, link)
• Improve TypeScript compiler options for scripts (link, link, link, link)

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 70a3f84

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[hyf0]

!bench

---

https://github.com/web-infra-dev/rspack/actions/runs/4752299331

[hyf0]

!bench

---

https://github.com/web-infra-dev/rspack/actions/runs/4752474689

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results

group                                                 baseline                                 pr
-----                                                 --------                                 --
criterion_benchmark/ten_copy_of_threejs               861.29      2.4±0.07s        ? ?/sec     1.00      2.8±0.83ms        ? ?/sec
high_cost_benchmark/ten_copy_of_threejs_production    2850.73      8.5±0.16s        ? ?/sec    1.00      3.0±0.80ms        ? ?/sec

[hyf0]

@IWANABETHATGUY The benchmark CI runs successfully. You are free to review this PR.

[IWANABETHATGUY]

@IWANABETHATGUY The benchmark CI runs successfully. You are free to review this PR.

Are you sure ? baseline now is 861 times slower than current branch

[hyf0]

!bench

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results

group                                                 baseline                               pr
-----                                                 --------                               --
criterion_benchmark/ten_copy_of_threejs               1.01       2.9±0.10s        ? ?/sec    1.00       2.9±0.12s        ? ?/sec
high_cost_benchmark/ten_copy_of_threejs_production    1.01       9.9±0.18s        ? ?/sec    1.00       9.8±0.32s        ? ?/sec